Anglin: I Do Not Personally Moderate (Or Even Really Read) This Forum

[majorwhiteboy]

FUCKING TRIGGERED!!!

[JustinCase]

I made this thread (link below) because I had a question about the memoryholing of threads

https://bbs.dailystormer.com/t/why-are-so-many-threads-being-deleted/114952

It's now deleted, but in short; Why the deleting of threads instead of just locking them?

The answer a mod wrote in the thread as he locked it was

7 day suspension
3.Creating a thread which attacks or spreads drama about any other pro-white website or pro-white personality (this includes figures and websites who are universally hated). This only applies to specifically pro-white individuals and groups, "Alt-Lite" figures who would be classified as "civic nationalists" are allowed to be attacked.

I did not attack anyone with my thread and the copy paste of the rules was not an answer. It still got locked and deleted.

It just reminds a little too much of that Stalin picture, you know which photo I'm talking about.

[phoenixrising]

TL;DR- To summarize Andrews point: harden the fuck up and stop whining like a bunch of bitches.

From my own point of view, since the numbers have started to increase on this forum I've noticed a lot of bickering over differences of opinion. I don't know about others here but I'm starting to find it fucking annoying watching every thread degenerate into a flame war. Opinions are like arseholes everyone has one and most of them stink. People need to grow thicker skin, grow up and show some fucking respect to others on here. If someone is getting under your skin or says something you don't like ignore it. We're supposed to be on the same side. How are we supposed to change anything in the world if we're too busy infighting over stupid little details / differences of points of view.

People need to harden up and start acting like grown men (and women ) instead of a bunch of snowflake little faggots.

Sorry @AndrewAnglin if I've overstepped the mark. You do great work bro and we really do appreciate your time.

[shitlording]

Flaming and arguing ad infinitum should be allowed on the forum [...] majority of arguments are between some hundreds of autistic posters [...] so there's no reason to ban or censor them! Why? if they want to argue untill unconsciousness, let them!

That would degrade the quality of the BBS to chan level. There's no reason for that. There are countless other forums people can join for those types of discussions. Certainly, aspiring NatSocs and fascists would be the last ones we'd imagine whinging about rules being enforced.

[clonesoftyr]

I have a problem with how popular you're becoming , and want to suck your energy and pretend it's my own

...oy vey

[Sam_Hyde]

Be careful when you choose moderators, there may be a jew among them..

[nyashmyash]

Amen

[nyashmyash]

"White Sharia" is faggy as hell

[kolarov]

no u

[The_Cuck_Slayer]

Anglin,

Here is an example of why women should be banned from the forum. I know that it is difficult to do cause they will start creating new accounts pretending to be men but many of them already do that. They cause a lot of shit on here.

Most of the shit that is

The ones that don't cause shit, make useless posts 90% of the time.

And they can't meme worth shit, except for that one bitch but she has been gone for a coons age now.

Everything else is great

[BlitzWolf]

P R E A C H
R
E
A
C
H

[clonesoftyr]

That girl is so pretty I feel guilty looking at her.

...if that's your girl awesome

[Hoarde]

I've read some hinky opinions posted on what is socialism or fascism threads and people with bizarre perceptions of the world. People with a poor writing ability and a dumb question to ask are starting whole threads and these threads are rising to the top as dumb replies get posted.

3 day suspension
11. Continued poor quality posting.

But I'm not bitching too much. Some of the shitposters seem to be younger or autistic not malicious.

The site, in general looks great and the new categories have got me thinking about sparking up some hobby or lifestyle threads.

[Plato_Hates_You]

Before you consider emailing to bitch at Anglin, write two lists. One, your grievances. The second, a list of everything AA has done and sacrificed for us as a cause.

Then burn the first list and realize some things just aren't that fucking important.

[AndrewAnglin]

It just reminds a little too much of that Stalin picture, you know which photo I'm talking about.

I think everyone pretty much understands that I'm open about everything and not trying to create some kind of Stalinist environment of censorship, so the suggestion of that is to me very rude and unnecessary.

I can still see that thread you linked, I think because I have a mod account. It's clear that you created it to create the kind of drama that is in the second post - a woman talking about some sort of other website and how I might be involved in some kind of conspiracy with them.

What other reason would you have to create the thread, other than to create drama? That you really think I'm involved in some Stalinist conspiracy to... silence drama? If it's the second thing, then the purpose of the thread would still be the first thing.

This is the absolute worst sort of cancer, and if you don't already understand why I don't want that kind of cancer on the site, then no amount of explaining is going to suffice. This is self-explanatory. Explaining why you aren't allowed to pollute the forum with that level of cancer would be like trying to explain to you that water is wet.

Why the deleting of threads instead of just locking them?

Because the entire point is to get rid of the content, which I don't want on my website.

Again, I'm not sure how that can be further elaborated on.

Wait.

Let me try.

deep breath

Okay.

Cancer on a WN forum, particularly that relating to arguments about religion or drama about various movement figures - and even just general flame wars related to any topic, and of course anything at all that gossipy women are trying to do to cause trouble - is called "cancer" because it spreads and eats up the good parts of a forum.

What you do with cancer on a forum is what you do with cancer in a body - you cut it out so that it does not continue to spread to good cells.

Also - maybe a bit less abstract - this website has very high Google rankings, and I don't want to host this drama material so that it comes up on search results. My own Google results are filled with people calling me a child molester race-traitor midget gook fucker. I personally consider this a badge of honor, but it's not a concept that I want to contribute to.

If you wanna do drama, I'm sure you know where to find it. This isn't the place for it.

[AndrewAnglin]

I think he's being sarcastic.

[AndrewAnglin]

Here's the context of this:

That was the first response to Justin's alleged "innocent question" about a possible Stalinist conspiracy on this forum.

I exercised executive privilege to ban this bitch - I have no idea why the mods did not.

There is absolutely nothing good that can come from a woman like this going around spreading schizoid gossip.

It is a very specific type of person who is interested in this kind of drama, and it will always be on the internet for them to go find. Wherever it is, they will find it, because they are that type of a person. By posting it here, they are attempting to use my resources to push their agenda, which is counter to my agenda.

[Dolph.Hilter]

I think this is a great forum and a lot of fun and serious info is in here. Thanks @AndrewAnglin !

[JustinCase]

I think everyone pretty much understands that I'm open about everything and not trying to create some kind of Stalinist environment of censorship, so the suggestion of that is to me very rude and unnecessary.

Your mod wasn't.

I can still see that thread you linked, I think because I have a mod account. It's clear that you created it to create the kind of drama that is in the second post - a woman talking about some sort of other website and how I might be involved in some kind of conspiracy with them.

How is it clear? I asked a very simple and short question because I wanted an answer that was nowhere to be found, and didn't get. Hence why I repeated the question here and elaborated on why this is so that an answer would be posted.

What spergs jump in and do is not under my control. That should be clear to anyone.

What other reason would you have to create the thread, other than to create drama? That you really think I'm involved in some Stalinist conspiracy to... silence drama? If it's the second thing, then the purpose of the thread would still be the first thing.

To get an answer? Is that some alien position to have around here? Everyone asking questions isn't a dramaposter you know. There are some of course, but I don't think assuming every one that want a simple short answer to a simple short question is out for blood is good.

This is the absolute worst sort of cancer, and if you don't already understand why I don't want that kind of cancer on the site, then no amount of explaining is going to suffice. This is self-explanatory. Explaining why you aren't allowed to pollute the forum with that level of cancer would be like trying to explain to you that water is wet.

Questions are cancer, got it.

JustinCase:

Why the deleting of threads instead of just locking them?

Because the entire point is to get rid of the content, which I don't want on my website.

Again, I'm not sure how that can be further elaborated on.

Thanks. An answer. Wasn't that easy?

I'm not commenting the rest. The answer above was enough you know..

[Angry_White_Goy]

I don't agree with everything last thing you say @AndrewAnglin but you've put together a awesome site and most importantly maintained it, I KNOW how hard that is.

So hat's off you you keep up the great work and full speed ahead!