I see you just ignored that part about them being enabled by traitors but I'll bite.
They played a major part in developing them
Just because they used their political influence to utilize the power of the United States military to expand Israels borders doesn't mean their interests don't mesh with yours. Until recently you both have gotten along just fine for the most part, disagreeing on the placement of Israel is a lot like Germans and Poles arguing over who has the right to the Danzig corridor.
Perhaps i should have said, they see you as a means to an end, although the amount of common ground both parties have in the destruction of the west are enormous. As i said earlier just because they use the US as a proxy to one up you to claim whatever piece of sand the two of you worship, or that the average Muslim kid is more likely to chuck a stone at a synagogue or beat up a kike in the middle of the street, it doesn't change the fact that the two of you demand less restriction on immigration, abuse the hospitality of the European people, and praise the demographic and cultural destruction of Europe. You even already acknowledged the fact that they opened the doors for you the first couple of times.
http://newobserveronline.com/israel-officially-aids-3rd-world-invasion/
Not in total disagreement here, my grandfather was at Anzio. He never really spoke much about the war but from what i was able to gather from him he was disgusted by the path society had taken and before he died even though he never said it directly, i could tell he regretted having taken part. The story that really stuck with me comes from an uncle of mine (married to my mothers sister) whos father was a medic with the army, he said the only way you could tell the difference between these baby faced 18-22 year olds was their uniforms, and at night it was nearly impossible to tell if you were treating a wounded American or German.
All that said, and no matter how much i admire the man, i will not paint Hitler as a vice-less saint. While he was by no means solely responsible for the outbreak of that fucking disaster, he wasn't entirely innocent either no matter how much everyone here wants to say "we dindu nuffin it was all the kikes" although they certainly benefited the most from the outcome.
No matter how much respect and admiration i have for Dr Duke, his brand of fair play and nationalism for everyone has not been remotely as effective as the more aggressive approach of /pol/ and Daily Stormer. To be honest i'm not even entirely sure he believes those things either, he probably sees it as the only course of action in this fucked up society to gain any sort of political traction. If he were proclaimed emperor of the United States tomorrow i can almost guarantee that he would stop immigration from everywhere except for Northwestern Europe (not that i really see anything wrong with this to be honest) and deport millions.
I cant deal with this level of cognitive dissonance, i have tried to remain respectable and have given my thoughts on the matter, i will let others give theirs now.
