Honestly, I don't really support this sexual puritanism at all, or think it is helpful, or has any relationship to historical European anything.
I mean this:
Or this:
Surely more sexually explicit than anything I've put up.
And these are 400 years old.
I don't know where this puritanism is actually even coming from.
I guess just from an inability to understand nuance, or qualitative values generally.
I guess if there is a heavy pushback against Frazetta, I can consider that as representative of the people, and consider changing it. I will.
But I think this sexual puritanism stuff is a boomerism, as it is intended to imply moral superiority, rather than to have any kind of practical value.
"Pornography" means "imagery explicitly designed to cause sexual arousal."
