BiggerNeater
Daily Stormer
August 7th, 2017
So this gay spic congressman on MSNBC (Mega-Super Nigger-Baiting Commies) says that Trump's reform of the immigration system is racist against the blacks, as if that's a bad thing.
Gutiérrez said, “I think this is absolutely a racist proposal. There is no doubt in my mind. If you take diversity visas, Alex. everyone knows 90 percent of the diversity visas go to who? Black people who live in Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa or the Caribbean. And you just eliminate it?
This is one of those moments where liberals are more honest than conservatives are. He's literally admitting in front of millions of MSNBC faggots that the legal immigration system as it stands is designed ONLY to bring in niggers. The difference between him and the average person is that while he fails to see the problem here, the average person - even a liberal - can see that there is a blatant lack of fairness here. "90 percent of something going to a specific group based on no factor other than race? Well gee wiz, that's not every equal, now is it?" Regardless of whether or not you believe that infinite niggers is a desirable end unto itself, the fact that we make it easier for them based only on skin color and illusory oppression is irrefutably unfair. Obivously, this is DR3 logic and we Alt-Righters believe that niggers should, in fact, be oppressed - but the fact that a stupid spic is inadvertently articulating this in front of millions of normies will open their mind to legal immigration question - thanks for the red pills, Gutierrez.
Senator Rubio’s parents wouldn’t have made it through this. My parents wouldn’t have made it through it. They didn’t have a college education. They couldn’t speak English and, yet, Rubio went on to the Senate, and I went on to the House of Representatives.”
"Gee wiz mister - you mean to say that Trump's immigration reform will prevent destructive traitors like little Marco and you away from the levers of power? Gee golly, where do I sign!"
Again with the redpills! Remember kids, even if those immigrants are dirty underclass laborers, they could potentially rise to power in the ZOG and become evil tyrants! It's as if his tiny beanmind is so trapped inside his leftist bubble that he fails to consider how his arguments will be received by the enemy side - that is, in a good way.
He continued, “I think this is an anti-American and it is based —
LOL I think it's more anti-Mexican than any thing, but it is most definitely FUCKIN' BASED
Alex, when you talk about, when you have a president of the United States that walks down those escalators and announce he’s running for president and says Mexicans are murderers, rapists, drug dealers and we need to get rid of them. And then you say, let’s make English— English has always been an important part of our immigration policy, but you know when you pass an English test, Alex, you pass it when you become a citizen of the United States. When you want to take that ultimate step. That’s always been there, and I think it always will be.”
Typical non-white "intelligence" - A discombobulated collage of random thoughts hastily strung together on the spot in an attempt to form an argument.
This is the form of his statement:
"look, this is bad. And then you have this, which is also bad. And then this is bad, and it has always been bad."
Let's attempt to translate this word salad into coherent language.
"This reform will make it harder for non-whites to enter the country - when we take into account the fact that Trump disparaged Mexicans during the campaign, and the fact that he wants new immigrants to speak a white language, we can infer that the true intention behind the reform is not simply to keep criminals out, but to prevent America's non-white population from rising."
Perhaps if he articulated his point in this way, it would have convinced more people. Unfortunately, he's arguing for our side and he doesn't even know it.
Remember kids, these are not random fucks off the street, these are the elites in control of the nation. Are you starting to get it yet?