Jew-Jitsu is ineffective in the streets, as every successful pogrom in history shows, but in political scams it is very strong.
The Alt-Right should take a collective deep breath with all this stuff coming out about McMasters. It's not a coincidence (but maybe it's a Cohencidence, or a Bannonincidence) that story after story, promoted by both the "right-wing" normie media and the MSM, are coming out to paint McMasters as a direct enemy of Donald Trump.
While there are plenty of good reasons to be ambivalent about the guy, it's clear that there is a lot of disinformation coming out of the media right now to make him look worse than he actually is.
This article is indebted to the wonderful research done by the goyim at The Conservative Treehouse (albeit a bunch of normies), who have demonstrated quite convincingly that there is a rather complicated plot afoot, entirely powered by lies, behind this McMasters nonsense.
To demonstrate this, let's first read up on the so-called "security clearance" granted to that whore Susan Rice:
The long knives are out after National Security Advisor McMaster, and those knives are transparently connected to a very familiar and historic ideological world-view.
Just to cut in real quick, the "historic ideological world-view" Sundance is referring to is the Pro-Israel lobby, which Sundance surprisingly directly names from time to time. He asks the reader later in the article to pay attention to the "sources" and "authorship" of all the recent McMaster articles hitting Breitbart and other places: Jewish media like the Jerusalem Post, Jews, and Israel-Firster groups made up almost entirely of Ted-Cruz style NeverTrumpers.
(This isn't the first time Sundance has noted the existence of an Israel-First agenda. During the election, he accused Mark Levin of opposing Trump precisely because he supported Israel before America.)
Now I'm not one of those Nazis who sees a Jew connected to something and automatically assumes it's an evil Jewish plot (even though it usually is), but if you examine the narrative and who is delivering that narrative, there is clearly a concerted effort by a bunch of hook-noses and Cruzbots to make us believe that McMaster is worse than the devil.
Anyway, let's continue:
Example: Circa News writer, Sara Carter, today pushes a story about HR McMaster giving Susan Rice access -via a letter of approval- to ongoing classified intelligence; at least that’s the way the narrative engineers who pick up the ball from Carter are selling it.
Except it’s not true; that angle/narrative is entirely false.
In the letter (included below) National Security Advisor HR McMaster simply gave former NSA Susan Rice permission to continue accessing historic classified intelligence that she created and received while Mrs. Rice was President Obama’s NSA lead.
McMaster is NOT giving Rice ongoing access to new intelligence information, or current classified intelligence information. His letter was simply authorizing her to reference and have access to the historic intel work product she previously, personally and specifically was involved in.
Obviously Rice’s prior NSC work-product remains classified and as such cannot leave the control of the National Security Council. Classified NSC information can be as innocuous as emails or memos to colleagues on the NSC during her tenure as NatSec Advisor, or it could be her schedule and calendar of events. The McMaster letter simply allows Rice to have continued access to prior content she was in charge of. Nothing more.
Sundance goes on to explain that such access is necessary if she is going to be involved in any kind of interrogation for her role in government. It's not some conspiracy to allow Rice to continue leaking stuff about Trump to the media, unless she intends to leak her own memos, which I guess is literally what Comey did. Whatever the case, it is really quite mundane, in all actuality.
This stuff about McMasters firing Trump supporters because they're "too pro-Israel" or "too anti-Muslim" should also be subject to intense scrutiny. While we should be happy if McMasters really is firing people because they're zionists (and, indeed, the majority of the people he has fired appears to be Jews), the stated reasons according to Breitbart and other sources shouldn't be taken as Gospel. It is very likely that they were fired not because they were Pro-Trump, but because they were NeverTrumper "conservatives" leaking to the media or otherwise doing bad things.
Hitting these particular talking points ("McMasters hates Jews and loves Muslims!") is a sure fire way to get your average cuckservative to enter a state of intense frenzy and thus drive a twitter campaign to undermine the Trump administration, and this is how we get into the "Jew-Jitsu" and "Bannon" segments of this article. In another piece, Sundance argues that the true aim of the anti-McMasters nonsense is to force Trump to fire Steve Bannon:
The real target is Bannon.
The professional-left know how to use the McMaster crisis as an opportunity to engage their real target. If leftists can help create a division between Bannon and McMaster they are more than willing to do so.
Ultimately they know if they can force a binary-choice between McMaster and Bannon, President Trump will have to choose McMaster.
The removal of Bannon, they predict, will infuriate the Trump base of support and ultimately provide the fracture needed to weaken the president.
HR McMaster has the support of General John Kelly, President Trump’s new Chief-of-Staff.
McMaster also has the support and confidence from: Defense Secretary General Mattis, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Joint-Chiefs Chairman General Joseph Dunford, Admiral Mike Rogers (NSA), Mike Pompeo (CIA) and ODNI Dan Coats.
Do you really think in a binary-choice between political strategist Steve Bannon and Nat/Sec Advisor HR McMaster, Prsident Trump is going to rebuke the most senior intelligence and security officials in his administration?
Think about it.
Now, this doesn't mean that the Jews originated the plan or anything. In fact, I'm not entirely convinced that this is a complicated plot to remove Bannon by the Jews. The media are clearly taking the opportunity to suddenly become great fans of someone in the Trump administration, and THEIR agenda is definitely to get rid of Bannon. But I also tend to suspect, and it seems most obvious really, that the McMasters disinformation is likely being directed directly by Bannon himself, and not because he's trying to safe his "Pro-Trumpers" who just happen to be hardcore Zionists.
It is an unfortunate myth that has developed that has painted Bannon as somehow being the "Nationalist" grand master and architect of the Trump administration. This has mostly been an MSM narrative, as they are intent on painting Trump as someone who has no core beliefs about anything but is just a puppet to whoever happens to be advising him. But it has also been a narrative that the NeverTrumpers, and even Bannon's people, have put forward themselves, and which has largely succeeded because of the very poor memory of your average conservative.
I have followed Breitbart since their inception, and one thing I have learned about Bannon and his crew is that they are masters at making conservatives believe that their political opinions of the year 2015, 2016, or 2017, happen to be the opinions conservatives have "always" held.
My chief go-to example of this has been the hard deportation position that Ted Cruz and Breitbart embraced during the nomination phase of the campaign. In all actuality, the mainstream position of conservatives way back in 2013 up to the advent of Trump was "yes" to legalization of illegal aliens (after the border is enforced), but "no" to citizenship and former illegals voting. You can see examples of this here, here, and here.
I remember this because I've been paying a lot of attention over the past 4 years. I remember Rush Limbaugh saying deportation was impossible, but border enforcement followed by legalization--with that order being very important--was very doable. And if Rush was saying that, it was the mainstream "conservative" view. Albeit, it was considered the "compromise" position because Democrats would never go along with anything else and because mass deportation was not feasible.
The Gang of Eight heresy of Marco Rubio was that there was no guarantee of border enforcement first, and Rubio wanted to grant illegals "amnesty," which entails citizenship. Cruz had the cutting edge position of multiplying H1B visas and Greencards in exchange for just granting illegal aliens legalization but without voting rights.
Why does all this matter? Because Breitbart under Bannon led the way in rewriting history once Trump's position became the mainstream position. Here is an example from a Breitbart news article (NOTE: NOT an opinion piece) basically calling Marco Rubio a liar over his correct statement that Cruz supported legalization in 2013:
While Cruz has never introduced legislation that would provide amnesty for illegal immigrants and would increase immigration, Sen. Rubio’s Senate career is largely defined by his partnership with President Obama to do just that.
Sen. Rubio’s Senate career is largely defined by his partnership with President Obama to deliver amnesty and citizenship to illegals. Rubio’s 2013 signature immigration legislation would have expanded welfare for immigrants, dramatically increased annual rates of immigration, and provided citizenship to those who have illegally entered the country or illegally overstayed their visas.
The lies used in this article are actually multi-layered. First, they actually ignored Rubio's actual accusation--that Cruz supported legalization--by focusing on Rubio's support of amnesty and Cruz's vote against amnesty. It's this deliberate obfuscation by both Breitbart and Ted Cruz regarding "amnesty" that allows this "news organization" to make such obvious Pro-Cruz propaganda pieces.
Ted Cruz defined "amnesty" solely as it related to citizenship, but he always supported legalization defined as permanent legal status (this Breitbart and Cruz says is NOT amnesty! LOL). Not just during the 2013 amnesty bill fight (because most Cruzbots argue, when watching that video I just linked to, that Cruz was lying to congress to "poison" the bill), but also after that on many separate occasions even up to 2015. You can see this here, here, here, and here.
You see here how they lie by playing on people's ignorance about how they are defining "amnesty?"
The second part of the lie was that Cruz never supported "expanding immigration." In fact, Cruz's amendment directly called for massively expanding H1Bs and Greencards in order to induce Congress to vote for his version of the bill. You can verify this on Cruz's own senatorial webpage, just scroll down. He called for doubling greencards and increasing H1-B visas "fivefold." Ted Cruz even voted against Session's amendments that would have done the exact opposite, and justified it saying we need to celebrate legal immigration.
(Bizarrely, Sessions announced in 2015 that Cruz was "with him every step of the way," despite the contrary evidence above, which was why I was surprised that Sessions ultimately endorsed Donald Trump.)
The only positive thing with Cruz's program was that he wanted to remove diversity requirements, thus treating all countries the same. In theory, this means white people could immigrate at the same heavy level as muds, but more than likely Cruz had other third-world countries in mind to benefit.
All of this research of mine isn't top secret information. When Breitbart was publishing puff piece after puff piece rewriting Cruz's immigration history, it was doing so knowing that they were spreading lies. And this is only the tip of the iceberg for the many deceptions and corruptions orchestrated by Bannon's Breitbart in order to aid Cruz and harm Trump during the campaign.
All of this is to simply illustrate that we shouldn't automatically trust Bannon simply because he's re-written his own history as a "Nationalist Rebel" running a "nationalist Pro-Trump website." Anyone remotely familiar with Bannon's actual positions over the many years would recognize his subtle and dishonest shift from Ted Cruz style Cuckservative, complete with Cruzian lies and positions on immigration and free trade, to suddenly "I'm a populist nationalist reading hardcore nationalist books and it has always been this way." This is a grand deception.
I would be wary of Bannon's efforts to fire McMaster, as they might actually be designed to get himself fired instead. When it comes down to it, while Bannon is a useful propagandist and helped prop up Trump's conservative bonafides, the only thing a Conservative Personality can be trusted to do--whether they're Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin (though maybe Hannity is okay)--is to promote their own interests at the expense of everyone else's.
Up until 2015, Bannon was just another Cruz style Republican with all the ideological baggage that entails with the Jews and globalist policies, including direct and unannounced ties (with money exchanging hands!) with the Cruz campaign. The Alt-Right should be prepared to throw him under the bus when it is convenient, and to raise him up above our heads when it is convenient, in the same way Bannon would do to us and Trump, and is likely currently doing to McMaster.
Really, the only people we can trust out here is our own movement and Trump himself. Everyone else? Well, what do you think?
