“Thou shalt not kill” is a simple assertion. But, that woman who cheated on you, ya, go ahead stone her. But wait, only those who are perfect may cast the first stone. Innumerable denominations are born.
But I think there is a way out. Most people believe in self-defense, at least up to the level of reasonableness. I have the right to protect myself, and to protect those around me. I am safer in a homogeneous culture. Cat Lady Christians running underground railroads of immigrants are a threat to my security. Faggots are as well. Especially since the promulgation of intersectionality. The undesirables banding together to destroy homogeneity are a threat to my security. So are ZioChristians promoting Jew wars. Opposing them is self-defense.
I have a responsibility to protect homogeneity for me and for those around me for our mutual security. We watch each other’s back. Further, parents have a duty to protect their offspring. So homogeneity is something that we do for all our generation’s wellbeing. Lack of doing so, is the basis of the charges brought against the boomer generation.
Generally, all the big ticket sins of the Bible are congruent with the preservation of a people. Lying Cheating, Stealing, Faggoting, Murder, Adultery degrade the Vitality of a Tribe and a Nation. That God told some people that they are bad isn’t surprising, it’s Empirical. Vitality promotes the ability to self-defend.
Degenerate doesn’t mean did some naughty thing with some naught body part. It means to tear down. Any tearing down of my Tribe is an attack on me and mine. So, for no more than self-defense, degenerates need to be controlled, with persuasion or the reasonable level of force.
Negros are just being Negros. Certainly we need to contain them and minimize the problem. I’d phase out feeding them and facilitate their return to their own land. Jews, on the other hand are active agents against us. History has shown that deporting them isn’t enough.
I think that the wide range of Christian interpretations helps support rise to the wide range of moral options. Since Christians can’t agree of what the Bible really means, as a whole they have little justification to proclaim moral Authority. As much as one sect is sure of something, another sect is sure of the opposite. Having a bunch of people claiming different versions of “What God Wants!” just doesn’t serve.
Christianity has many beautiful aspects. The nativity of the birth of Jesus at the time of the birth of a new solar year. The Germanic custom of decorating trees and Yule logs melds it into ours as Europeans. The Resurrection of Jesus at the time that tress regrow their leaves. When Christian customes were a part of American lives it was a better time.
But it has negatives that ask for rectification. Super-nationality. Universality. Christion-Zionist are perfectly willing the kill our people because they are so desperate for Heaven. Having a future life in store can empower a warrior, but it also leads some into “since the world is ending soon…” Some become absolutists about a book that is subject to interpretation. The Bible itself has become their God.
My question of what is the required minimum subset of beliefs is directed towards bringing the various sects towards a happy medium. To make Christianity enjoyable for all of society like in the old days. But not so exclusivist that it leads people to oppose for fear that someone will throw them into a boiling pot for being judged not believing enough. Prune what’s extraneous, amplify what’s useful for a happy productive society.
I assert that the moral code derives from what’s good for the Tribe, with respect for the general dignity of human life. Freedom to interact with religion and God as people see fit. But within the bounds of self defense.
