It is unrealistic to speak of woman in terms of utility. She is not "for the kitchen". She is the Heart. She is man's partner. She is the object for which man willingly lays down his life. It is true that her proper role is within the home where man brings the food and she prepares it. But the way you speak of her suggests that, to you, she has no value. And because even she thinks this about herself, society is broken.
And, actually, she is the moral beacon of society, not man. Once she is corrupted, everything falls. This isn't because of what Anglin says: that women just want to destroy the white man. It is because the role of woman is critical to a moral and just society and man, rightly, depends on her more than he likes to admit.
It is true that a woman is more emotional than a man but she needs to be this way so that she can care for young children properly. Why is this not valuable? She is also detail-oriented. A just man will listen to his wife and make decisions accordingly. The point is that HE is making the decisions. A man who does whatever his wife tells him to do is a weak man and she will have no respect for him. But on the other hand, to write off all of her complaints as simply being "emotional" is tyrannical. In this, you are not encouraging her to be feminine (aka vulnerable). You are telling her that her feminine nature is inconvenient and weak and she will work to suppress it hence: divorce, women in the workplace, birth control, women wearing men's clothing and abortion. But if you want the white race to continue you must realize that femininity is a beautiful thing but, like everything else, it needs to be properly ordered.
